Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts

Jan 28, 2015

The Future is Holographic

The Genesis of Your Mixed Reality Future

 

With the recent announcement by Microsoft concerning the HoloLens project, the tech world is buzzing at the possibilities. There has been (of course) other initiatives in this field in the past few years going back to at least 2012 with Natalia from Sensics and more recently MetaOne and Atheer.

 

But what does this all mean for the general population?

 

 

microsoft_hololens_video

 

Well, it means that while we were all looking at Virtual Reality as the “future” of the working environment, us futurists were quietly thinking about something far better and working toward it. If you are a reader of this blog, then you already know I’ve been in this field for a few years now and have been saying this was coming. It’s not a situation where I was right and everyone else was wrong, but I chose the side of innovation and futurism to know this was the next logical step forward.

 

It would seem other major corporations were on the same train of thought, which would explain why Google jokingly announced “Cardboard” in response to all the VR hype but then quietly dropped a substantial amount of money into MagicLeap for their AR development. In that MagicLeap raised over $500 million dollars in funding is a telling sign. (Yes, that’s a half a billion in funding)

 

One of the reasons I started falling back away from Virtual Reality is that I believe I’ve seen most of the possible use cases and that (as far as I can ascertain) everything else is merely a derivative of those main use cases. On a more logical assertion, the problem was that most of those use cases were just better served by Mixed Reality and not Virtual Reality.

 

There had to be something better... After all, is the evolution of synthetic environments actually just a few iterations of virtual reality head gear?

 

After seeing the initial wave of hype come and go for Oculus, I also saw a lot of the same sorts of “solutions” in third parties arising again. Sixense controllers, and an Omni treadmill, strapping a LeapMotion on the front of the headset as a peripheral addition.

 

But ultimately what all those things are trying to do is emulate what it would be like in a fully mixed reality environment. A headset that is built entirely on the premise of mixed reality wouldn’t have any of those issues or need for third party products for functionality.

 

If we were to look at the nascent AR industry over the past five years, we’d see that the paradigm of interaction has been the problem, not the use cases. No better could I demonstrate this than by all of the AR applications on tablets and smart phones – which again were touted as the future when they all started flooding the scene.

 

For instance, SemblanceAR (PlayAR) by Mark Skwarek in NYC is a major innovation, but by god is it crippled by being forced to work on a smart phone and tablet. The problem isn’t the AR application anymore but the paradigm of interaction and hardware it is being forced to run on. Google started an initiative in Project Tango to enable smart phones and tablets with RGBD cameras (3D Cameras) to try and alleviate that, but I think they got the point quickly when they decided to invest in MagicLeap.

 

So we’re back to the main point of HoloLens and what it really means to the industry. Let’s take a little bit and try to break this down.

 


 

Canary in the Mine

 

On the whole, HoloLens is an impressive demonstration. That being said, what Microsoft showed off to a select press was a lot of smoke and mirrors. After all, you didn’t likely hear about the lightweight glasses being hard tethered to multiple PCs to do the heavy computing, and you likely didn’t hear the perspective that the rooms and scenarios were very tightly controlled circumstances.

 

Instead, we heard about what it could do in those very tightly controlled circumstances and we were offered the Microsoft concept video as the “proof”. The concept video showing what they think it will look like and do whenever it is released (use cases) but by no means is it showing the headset in real time.

 

If they did show you the headset as it actually exists, it would look like this:

 

WPTV-Microsoft-HoloLens

 

Sure, it can do amazing things under those controlled conditions, but that’s not a real world scenario. If I moved that coffee table, would it still be able to perform like the demo? Could it adjust the dynamic and still make it disappear and shatter into a million pieces?

 

At this point, that is unlikely.

 

Everything in those demonstrations was highly controlled and everything in those rooms were placed with a very specific purpose. It was intentional.

 

If so much as that coffee table were to be moved, the whole demonstration would have broken there on the spot, which would explain why the head guy in charge was so nervous showing it off.

 

That isn’t to say that the HoloLens is not damned impressive, because it is absolutely impressive for a number of reasons – assuming we disregard the negative things.

 

What it represents is less of a technical achievement and more of a canary in the mines situation in the synthetic environment industry.

 

Nobody outside of the early adopters and synthetic environment enthusiasts were interested in the MetaOne headset, the Atheer came and went without widespread public adoption, and even the ODG Headset coming out at the end of the year costs $5,000. Less obvious is that Microsoft actually paid ODG something like $200 million dollars for the patents (or they licensed it all) in order to suddenly announce HoloLens a year later.

 

So if you’re wondering what a pair of HoloLens glasses actually are, then you can safely assume it’s about on par with a pair of ODG Smart Glasses with a few minor improvements. Hopefully, Microsoft isn’t going to sell their version for $5,000. While all of this is really interesting to know (and gives us insight), the main point is that the world didn’t get excited when ODG announced their glasses (but some tech journalists did) and when Microsoft announced their own version based on the same technology, the whole world got excited overnight.

 

Allow me to reiterate: The mainstream public weren’t excited about this until a major player such as Microsoft came along and debuted their version of the same thing.

 

I mean, let’s be honest for a moment. When I said this was the future a couple of years ago, I distinctly remember being called out with the “put up or shut up” line now famously ingrained in my mind by a reader’s comment. Because clearly, as he would have had it, it was virtual reality and things like OpenSim that were the future.

 

That’s really the trouble with being a trend forecaster. You see it coming and nobody takes your word for it until it’s blatantly obvious and hindsight.

 

So yes, for the past few years I’ve been saying that VR isn’t going to be the miracle renaissance platform that everyone thought it would be, and I‘ve been also saying the field to pay attention to is Augmented and Mixed Reality. Don’t get me wrong, I absolutely love virtual reality and the Metaverse (capital M), but the virtual reality hype of it being the “’thneed” (Lorax reference there) is exaggerated by a light year.

 

That doesn’t mean virtual reality isn’t important, nor does it mean that the advances in that industry aren’t valuable. They are both immeasurably important in the bigger picture. I cannot possibly convey that notion enough.

 

What this actually means is that you can bet every major tech company is now pivoting and creating a future AR/MR Strategy for their companies. It’s no longer “What is our VR strategy?” but now “What is our AR/MR Strategy?”

 

That’s a huge paradigm shift.

 

But then again, we should have seen it coming. After all, nobody really gave VR much of a thought until some major corporations got involved. Whether it’s the initial hype of Second Life and all the brands coming in (and then leaving) or later on when an upstart Kickstarter project got bought out by Facebook for a few billion dollars.

 

When those things happen, it’s blood in the corporate water and the sharks come swimming up for the buffet.

 


 

Past Tense Future

 

In the short term, what you should expect to see is the synthetic environment industry suddenly focusing on Augmented and Mixed Reality devices in a rush to be “first to market”. At the very least, you’re going to see a lot of “me too” announcements in the next year or so.

 

This isn’t necessarily “bad” so to speak, because it advances a larger initiative that is bigger than all of them. So I’m actually happy about this canary in the mines situation.

 

Of course, in a more personal sense, I’m happy about this situation on the whole because it continues to advance what I was originally working on all this time (as well as the entire industry).

 

If anything, this actually accelerated things by a factor of ten. Where before I had a very hard time convincing pretty much anyone that this was the future (let alone understand what I was even describing) and they should be paying attention to it, now after this announcement every major corporation on Earth (just about) is quite eager to get in on the industry (at least if they’re smart).

 

I should know... because I have a meeting soon to discuss just that with one of them. I’m still not at liberty to discuss who that is (still), or disclose a lot of specific details about what it is and does, but you’ll be the first to know when I am cleared to do so. For now, I will share just a concept shot and let your mind wander.

 

Personally, I’m playing the long game scenario and looking to build it the best possible way it can be done, with emphasis on applying everything I’ve learned from virtual worlds research across the board for a better ecosystem and paradigm of interaction.

 

Ultimately, that is going to mean that we don’t focus on trying make a pair of sunglasses (because it’s underpowered that way) and at the same time we don’t make a gigantic helmet, (Sensics SmartGoggles). I believe the medium between the two is simply a lightweight, wireless (and convertible) headset that effectively turns real life (outside as well) into Second Life.

 

 

Genesis One HMD - Side Left

 

Now, this is completely aside to what I’m personally up to these days. The main take-away from these developments is that whether or not what I’m up to succeeds, you’re still going to see a revolution in synthetic environments with augmented reality wearable devices in the near future. I really think you’ll start seeing some serious contenders in the next few years.

 

I can only hope that in my own endeavors I can strive to push that even further for your continued benefit. Either way, the next few years are going to be pretty amazing – so look forward to it.

 

 


Jan 10, 2014

The Rise of Google+

In a connected world, #socialmedia is just the beginning

 

 

googlePlus

 

Ever since the introduction of Google+ I’ve been watching the atmosphere surrounding it quite curiously. Up front, I’m going to state that I dramatically prefer Google+ over Facebook and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. This may sound like something you’d hear from an idiotic fanboy, but this isn’t about blind faith or anything like that – my allegiance is to the future, and by the end of this post, you just might feel the need to jump ship and not look back at the big blue again.

 

For now, let’s cover the basics: On the one side are the haters – people just hellbent on seeing Google+ fail and pretending like everything Google plugs it into is part of their failed strategy to make it into a successful social media platform, and then there are the people that drink the Google Kool-aide thinking it’s the best social media platform ever.

 

The problem with this all along is that both sides of the coin are dead wrong.

 

Facebook showed up to a thermonuclear arms race with a potato gun... let’s find out why.

 


 

Google+ isn’t a social media platform

 

Let’s get this out of the way early in the discussion. Google+ was never meant to be a social media platform to compete with Facebook, and the irony is that Facebook was never in the same league as Google+ in overall scope. Both exist for very different reasons, of which Google will shine and Facebook will eventually crash and burn.

 

Don’t believe me?

 

Let’s take a look at what’s really going on then, and hopefully you’ll begin to understand the real point of Google+ in the bigger picture.

 

In order to properly frame the context, we need to start from the beginning, and that means it’s time to hop into the Wayback Machine with Mr Peabody and Sherman.

 

 

1344348091_mr_peabody_and_sherman_oo Coincidentally, Dreamworks is making a movie of this in 2014

 

 

In the beginning there was...

 

NIST: National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace

 

 

The National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC) envisions a cyber world – the Identity Ecosystem - that improves upon the passwords currently used to log-in online. It would include a vibrant marketplace that allows people to choose among multiple identity providers - both private and public - that would issue trusted credentials that prove identity.

 

For example, student Jane Smith could get a digital credential from her cell phone provider and another one from her university and use either of them to log-in to her bank, her e-mail, her social networking site, and so on, all without having to remember dozens of passwords. If she uses one of these credentials to log into her Web email, she could use only her pseudonym, "Jane573." If however she chose to use the credential to log-in to her bank she could prove that she is truly Jane Smith. People and institutions could have more trust online because all participating service providers will have agreed to consistent standards for identification, authentication, security, and privacy.

 

 

The point of NSTIC was to leverage an ecosystem of profile information that could be verified against multiple sources (and interactions) in order to reasonably ascertain a person’s trusted identity online. If you say you are Jane Smith, then the point of NSTIC is to have multiple trusted parties online vouch for you in order to strengthen the plausibility and create a reasonable assurance it was you.

 

NSTIC wasn’t going to do this itself, and that is also the point (if you read the website). Instead, the mandate falls upon online entities which collect and curate identifying information about you in order to create a sort of digital passport for your actions. At the time (and this is still true), there was no better way to do this than to set up a wonderful social media network and make it so popular that hundreds of millions of people will share all sorts of information about themselves, which in turn creates a “social profile” that can be reasonably verified for further interactions and relevance.

 

Facebook was likely the first into this foray with Facebook Connect and their SocialGraph implementations a few years back – and being the head of the pack for social media, they were an obvious forerunner to make this happen.

 

But something happened along the way that nobody expected.

 


 

Wibbly Wobbly Timey Wimey Stuff...
 
 

 

Yes, I know... My mind is bigger on the inside.

 

 

Google realized that this whole trusted identity management thing was beneficial outside of the Internet and into a wholly connected life. The future is actually in an Internet of things, and those things need to know who you are. They, too, decided that the days of multiple logins and passwords were out the door and so unified their entire ecosystem under a single digital identity management dashboard known as Google+. They also realized that in a connected world, it’s pretty stupid to balkanize a slew of services and treat them separately since they all have a relevance to each other – for instance your Gmail Contacts work in Google+ and also Google Voice/Hangouts, which in turn are connected to your Android device, and so on and so forth.

 

Everything you do in their ecosystem is now tied to your NSTIC profile in Google+, which is a weighted and long-term profile passport. The more you use it and engage with it, the stronger that identity passport gets which in turn raises your relevance online, and therefore increases the “trust” in that identity.

 

This is roughly the point where Google+ and Facebook part ways in how this NSTIC is implemented and to what extent, because it is about here where Facebook no longer has the power to tread while Google will keep on trucking long into the (automated, post-scarcity, robotic) future.

 

Let’s compare...

 

Facebook is idle in the social media sphere, but using SocialGraph (Facebook Connect) you still are required to log into whatever apps 3rd parties offer within the Facebook ecosystem, as well as whatever 3rd parties across the world wide web implement the Facebook Connect login. This is a basic form of utilizing that NSTIC aspect, but that’s about the end of the road for Facebook.

 

On the other hand, the Google ecosystem is far more robust and so their NSTIC extends into nearly every part of your digital life and into real life as well.

 


 

The following things use your Google+ identity

And this is just the tip of the iceberg...

 

Android Tablets/Phones – Google owns Motorola now, so they make their own tablets and phones, and some damned good ones at that. Sure you could use your smartphone or tablet without logging in, but your functionality may as well be crippled.

 

Google Chrome Browser – Arguably one of the best browsers for the web.

 

ChromeCast – Now it’s on your television.

 

ChromeBook – Google has their own laptops now, connected to Google Drive.

 

Google Wallet – Used to make purchases online or in real life via NFC on your tablet or phone.

 

Google Play – Now you know what Google Wallet is for online

 

 

Google Self Driving Car When was the last time you saw a Facebook self-driving car?

 

 

Google Cars – It’s not a far fetch to think that Google intends on integrating its technology into self driving cars, and now your car can identify you properly. The car of the future doesn’t need keys in the ignition and quite frankly it probably doesn’t even need you to do anything but get in and go for the ride. Owning a self-driving car is in the near future as Google went ahead and lobbied for laws to be put into place in order to make them road legal.

 

Unless you don’t need to buy a car anymore because self-driving cars are more efficient and you really only need to get from point A to B reliably on demand, in which case your Android smartphone or tablet (when logged in) could call a car to you (because the phone/tablet knows where you are), debit your account (Google Wallet), and using Google Maps tell the car how to get there and back.

 

All as fast as you can say “Ok Google, Send a Car”

 

On your Google Glass AR headset.

 

And of course there is the Music, Books, and other media that are all available on Google Play for purchase and viewable on your laptop (maybe a Chromebook?) or an Android device linked to the Play Store, where you’ve logged in with your Google Account -

 

Which is to say - Google+

 

Then there is Youtube, and this one was a huge contention among longtime users of the service. But youtube isn’t an independent company any longer and is owned by Google as a service, so it makes absolute sense that it’s integrated with Google+ because comments and interaction are part of your NSTIC identity and social media interaction overall is how that identity gets strengthened or weakened to be more or less relevant in the bigger picture. The spam and abuse filters in the Youtube comments system are likely the same ones that were used and trained in Gmail – so while there was a sudden rush of spam and abuse comments in the beginning, all that did was accelerate the heuristic learning system to teach it what is good and bad.

 

And you really thought Google screwed up and didn’t expect the influx of spam and abuse, didn’t you? Wrong... they were betting on it, and they won.

 

There is, of course, Google Hangouts which is a free chatting and video call service that is also integrated with Google Voice. Free phone calls anywhere in the United States, and up to ten people in a video chat for free.

 

And then obviously there is Gmail which is also integrated into the ecosystem for email.

 

All of this is tied into and feeding your NSTIC passport. It’s all interconnected in digital life and real life over time. The more you use any service in the ecosystem the stronger or weaker you make your trusted identity, and the more you either increase or decrease your relevance to that system.

 

Want to be heard in a Youtube conversation in the comments? If you haven’t built up your NSTIC identity through Google+, which is to say logged in and used any of the services or provided information to it in order to reliably verify you and then taken the time to build your identity up reasonably through interaction, then your comments are considered anonymous and irrelevant. You go to the bottom of the pile.

 

Not to mention that Google Search itself is now based on Google+ and your social relevance among the ecosystem. The search results are now tailored to the individual based on relevance and your interactions across the whole ecosystem – so it weighs what your friends have to say higher than what a random company on the Internet trying to SEO their way into the results has to say.

 

 

Grand_Universe_by_ANTIFAN_REAL

If you squint really hard, you’ll see the pixel representing Facebook in the Google Universe

 

 

In order for Facebook to even be anywhere in the same universe as Google+ at this point, their ecosystem would have to include the following:

 

Facebook would have to have its own search and video service, so let’s say Microsoft bails them out and integrates Bing search and Video. They’d also have to offer voice service for free in the United States and give you your own phone number, then they’d have to convince Microsoft to let Skype have free video chat with groups while building an HTML5 integrated system into Facebook.

 

Facebook would also have to start making their own Facebook laptops, smartphones, and tablets while also offering Facebook Cloud Drive. And while we’re at it, they’d have to offer a free suite of collaboration tools that use that cloud drive such as Google Docs, etc uses for Google Drive. Again, maybe Facebook could convince Microsoft to make Live365 services free and integrate them into Facebook?

 

Then Facebook would also have to have their own Facebook Maps service, and then Facebook Cast to let it work on your HDTV and tie into the whole ecosystem under the single Facebook login. You would also have to convince Facebook to run their own Facebook Marketplace for every conceivable media type on the planet as well as apps market for the Facebook phones and tablets.

 

But the truth is... Facebook doesn’t really have any of that in the bigger picture, which is why they are cramming advertising into every inch of Facebook they can intrusively to make quarterly profits.

 

Google+ isn’t even remotely close to being the failure that people want to believe it is.

 

If anything, Google+ is doing what Facebook failed to achieve – a ubiquitous identity management system that extends across the Internet and real life under countless circumstances and scenarios, connecting every facet of your digital life together seamlessly – of which only one out of an increasing number of use cases for it looks like social media.

 

So in the future, it’s probably a good idea to manage your Google+ identity and engage with that ecosystem, since it’s going to become a very large part of your digital and real life going forward and across the board.

 

Or you can convince yourself that Facebook has a future and that Google isn’t running circles around them... but that would be kinda delusional at this point, because we’ve only just scraped the tip of the iceberg with the total ubiquity that Google is implementing.

 

In the bigger picture, Facebook never had a fighting chance.

 


 

Ready to engage?

Share, Plus and Discuss.

 


 

 

Nov 25, 2013

The Day The Music Died

#AOL to discontinue Winamp as of Dec 20th

 

After 16 years of Whipping the Llama’s Ass, it looks like the company that should never have survived the dotcom bubble is discontinuing the media player that is a hallmark and legend.

 

 

Winamp

 

 

Of course, we’re talking about AOL deciding to shut down Nullsoft altogether, meaning Winamp and all related products and services go dark as of December 20th 2013. Users are (of course) looking for alternatives to Winamp while many are simply saying they’re going to continue using Winamp until it spontaneously explodes from being abandonware.

 

I have a mixed feeling about this situation... I’ve been using Winamp for the entire 16 years that it has existed (I remember the initial release in 1997), and it’s been my favorite media player since then. To see it being discontinued by AOL is like the ultimate “Are you fucking serious?” moment followed by the invention of a string of obscenities that are dangerously close to tearing a hole in the fabric of time|space and unleashing flying technicolor ass-cracks onto the executives of AOL.

 

Of course, I have an alternative player (being AIMP) but it has some quirks...

 

Screenshot_4As you can see on the left, you can make AIMP look just like Winamp if you really want to. At least a reasonable mockup, though I actually used the “Good ‘Ol Winamp” setting on the modern skin in Winamp to get the purple and green version.

 

I can’t exactly get that same color setup in AIMP so I’m sorta stuck with the blue and silver skin (for now). I have (most predominantly) taken to using the Eternity skin for AIMP which is dark with orange though I can’t horizontally resize it, which aggravates me to no end. Luckily I can resize horizontally with the Winamp Modern Skin for AIMP... To remedy the situation, I’ve inquired about having the skin author do a Good Ol’ Winamp purple and green version... so we’ll see how that goes.

 

It’s not like Nullsoft wasn’t making any money... last time I checked, they were pulling about 6 million bucks a year, which is definitely more than AOL was worth in their heyday (zing!)

 

There is (of course) the rumor that Microsoft is already talking with AOL about buying Nullsoft, which means Winamp and Shoutcast services. I think it’s the only time I’ve uttered the phrase “At least there is a glimmer of hope... Microsoft could buy them.”

 

I feel very dirty saying that out loud.

 

Screenshot_3

I really do like the darker skins for media players, and preferably ones that aren’t too busy. So, the Eternity skin on the right is actually pretty nice and it’s less of an assault on my eyes. Though I can’t resize it horizontally so the thing looks a bit small on my screen... Like I said, AIMP has a few quirks but overall it’s a good player.

 

I’ve attempted to use Foobar2000 and have come to the “Oh, hell no...” conclusion. I do have VLC installed as well, but it’s more of a no-frills Swiss Army knife.

 

At least one good thing about AIMP is that it has a nice docking feature where it can dock to a side of the screen and then slide out of view. Very classy. Then there is a ... information bar at the top which displays the current song and information when the song starts. It displays across the top of the screen itself (though I suppose you could disable it entirely if you wanted).

 

I think no matter what, I’m going to be a fan of Winamp. It’s been a part of my digital life for 16 years, and there really isn’t anything that captures the feel of it. Sure, we all had a fit when AOL bought it and made it bloated – after all, the Winamp I grew accustomed to was lightweight and powerful. Minus all of the bloatware baggage in the code, I think under it all there is still the Winamp we grew to love before AOL got their hands on it...

 

I think the best case scenario... despite my better judgement, is Microsoft buys Nullsoft and all related services in order to keep it going under the //shudders// Micro...soft... banner...

 

I think a piece of my soul just died.

 

What are the odds Microsoft doesn’t buy it up and AOL discontinues it but decides to Open Source the whole thing?

 

I can dream, right?

 

If you’re looking for a good lateral move from Winamp, you can check out AIMP at the following address:

 

http://www.aimp.ru/

 

And also the Winamp Modern skin on deviantArt. Just do a search.

 


 

Freeze-ray. Stops time. Tell your friends.

 

At this point, all I can say is that all sorts of crazy acquisitions are going on in the tech industry. Apple bought out Primesense (the company behind the original tech for the Kinect) – so you can take a wild guess what the iPhone 6 is going to have. But then, Intel and SoftKinetic are teaming up to make short range depth cameras to stick into laptops, tablets and smart-phones next year... so you get the gist about what everyone is up to.

 

 

Screenshot_5

 

There’s this sudden rush to the AR market, as I predicted from the catalyst effect stemming from Google Glass (and the real reason Google wanted to make Glass). And even before Google Glass (a few years ago) I forecasted the rise of Augmented Reality in a bigger sense. But it’s still a few years off at this point since everyone is rushing into it with half-cocked thinking just to be on the bandwagon.

 

I’m not sure why everyone is stuck thinking in localized space and PTAM. I never really had any faith in the idea of one trick pony apps for mobile that were AR. But that’s neither here nor there because that’s not something I have to deal with personally.

 

ptam_screenshot Speaking of AR, I had a wonderful meeting with Primesense earlier this morning, and will have a follow-up December 5th to figure out what the hell Apple is going to do with their 350 million dollar acquisition. In the bigger picture, it would seem Liza Roumani and I are both hoping Apple isn’t going to liquidate Primesense and lock the technology behind closed doors, but Liza isn’t sure yet what Apple is planning. Seems like they’re just as in the dark at the moment as anyone else about what’s going on (either that or they aren’t allowed to say publicly). I’m all for Apple and advancing their products (it’s a business after all) but I hate it when bigger companies buy up little companies and then lock it all up in a vault.

 

Doubly so when Primesense was facilitating OpenNi with the hardware worth using in conjunction with the open standard for 3D framework sensing. If Apple were to nix that, I’d be pretty pissed off at them for being colossal dickweeds.

 

But I suppose Liza wouldn’t have wanted to have another conversation on December 5th if she knew Apple was going to liquidate Primesense entirely. So there’s still hope that I won’t have to pay a visit to Cupertino and deal with Tim Cook... but I suppose if I have to, then so be it.

 

Though I’ve been talking with SoftKinetic as well about the possibility of a long-range RGB-D sensor. Considering ZCam and Canesta were bought out by Microsoft, I’m going to have to pick my poison...

 

Microsoft... Apple ... or Intel.

 

Maybe Apple actually is the lesser of the evils at this point.... or maybe I’ll get lucky and Primsense will continue being around to support OpenNI with their sensors while Apple just licenses it while using it for their own stuff. That seems to be the hope from Liza as well because she’s actually interested in what we’re up to with Parallel Worlds, and I think she sees that Primesense Capri3D would be a perfect fit. Probably a hell of a lot better than cramming it into an iPhone and iPad.

 

2014 is going to be a huge push for augmented reality and related devices, so prepare yourself now. Luckily, I’m already ahead of the curve and past the small localized spaces augmented reality and thinking into the very large spaces...

 

Honestly, it only dawned on me recently that the problem with AR is actually more to do with solving the long standing issues with Virtual Worlds, which I happen to already be good at. Turns out they have more in common than I thought, but for entirely different reasons than the industry thinks. Plus, those solutions are at a level of complexity that I’m pretty certain few are in a position to solve.

 

There is still the nagging issue that a lot of those sensors seem to fail when outside. It makes me wonder how the hell anyone was going to use them attached to tablets and smart phones if they only work indoors under very tight conditions... I wouldn’t think Apple would spend 350 million dollars on Primesense if the sensors didn’t work outdoors... but I suppose I’ll figure that out anyway at some point. That’s why I’m talking with a few companies to figure out a good solution that isn’t going to explode like a vampire in daylight.

 

Either way, I’m still about 5-10 years ahead of the curve, assuming Captain Hammer doesn’t throw a car at me.

 

 

Screenshot_6

 

 

I often forget I’m technologically spoiled. Kinda hard to stay grounded when you’re offered access to 32 geo-synchronous satellites, a super-computer, and all sorts of technology on a regular basis. It’s made me into the sort of person that doesn’t take something as read when people say it’s not possible – I’m almost sure a lot of things are possible, but nobody has questioned it enough to figure it out yet. Makes me feel like Dr. Horrible sometimes, building a Freeze Ray to stop time... I just hope Apple Computer doesn’t act like Captain Hammer, corporate tool...

 

Somebody has to think of the bigger picture and ask the proverbial “Why not?” – I think it’s just coded into my DNA at this point.

 

Anyways... yeah... 2014 is gonna be a huge augmented reality year. Tell a friend.

 

Also, the Freeze Ray stops time... it’s not an Ice Gun. That’s Johnny Snow.

 


Jun 20, 2012

Microsoft Surface

Oh look, it’s a laptop/tablet hybrid design.

 

On Monday, Microsoft had this huge press conference to unveil plans for something they said would be revolutionary and, more to the point, a paradigm shift in computing interfaces. Of course, this is a really loose paraphrase because for all I know they were promising that they’d invented a new way to slice bread.

 

Over the weekend, millions of people were taking shots at what this amazing revelation could be, while I on the other hand already knew. To be honest, I knew this was coming a year ago so this is yet another case of the future catching up to me instead of the other way around. When I originally said it, I asserted (as I continued to do) that the only way that Windows 8 Metro made any sense at all was if it was married to a hybrid tablet/laptop design and that Microsoft clearly was designing an OS for devices that didn’t exist yet but were anticipating would exist.

 

Let me introduce to you the beginning of what will be the convergence of computing.

 

When I say “convergence” what I mean is that for all the times people have told me that tablets and mobile are the future, I just laugh and tell them they’re wrong. It’s not about Tablets or about Mobiles, and it’s not about whether or not PCs in any form are dead. What this is about is hybrid computing environments, as I said last year in the article The Future: Now In Tablet Form

 

 


 

 

94_00002386e_148d_Windows-Surface-Tablet-with-White-cover

 

A tablet used as the screen which is detachable from the keyboard? No way!

 


 

Last year I asked the question – what if the future is just a scenario where the screen on your laptop is the tablet and it detaches from the base unit to become a mobile device? Well, this is the future… However, that being said, this is only the beginning of that future. The second part of my question/statement was concerning the keyboard section being the more powerful base station while the tablet portion as the screen was the mobile processing computer on the go. When you docked the tablet to the base station the processing would switch over from the tablet to the base station to handle the tasks in a more robust manner.

 

We’re not quite there yet, but there are clearly prototypes in the works. The base station concept is a logical next step for computer manufacturers at this point instead of just slapping a keyboard on a tablet and calling it a day. At least I really hope so, because it would suck horribly if we were all being forced into a future where we’re paying the same price of an entry laptop and getting half the power and capabilities.

 

In this scenario, it’s also likely that systems like this would be wirelessly connected to the home computer as a server or something to offset the fact that you’re getting royally screwed on tablet storage. It’s 2012 and I still think cloud computing and storage as it is currently presented is a rip-off, and you can quote me on this freely.

 


 

In which Microsoft sells you half the computer and OS for the same price while calling it innovation.

 


 

Renting Your Data

 

I’m not ok with this idea and never have been. For cloud storage services the cost you pay is astronomical in relation to the actual storage space you get in return. At about $50.00 USD per month for 1TB of cloud storage, within 2 months you’ve already paid enough to rent that space to actually have bought an external 1TB hard drive outright.

 

For instance, let’s take DropBox as an example. On average, 1,000GB of storage is $15.00 USD per user, per month with a maximum amount of users being 500. Let’s say for an average household of 5 people (Mom, Dad and three kids) that’s $75 per month. Right there in the first month you may as well have bought a 1TB external HD and hooked it up to your home network. As a matter of fact, over the life of using cloud storage you would have spent so much money for the convenience of accessing your stuff “everywhere” that it becomes overkill.

 

Don’t get me wrong, cloud storage and access is going to continue being integrated into nearly everything and you are going to be forced into using it at every turn. For evidence of this, just look at the tablet/laptop hybrid above and ask whether 64GB hard drive is really enough for you?

 

Of course not.

 

That’s why Windows 8 conveniently comes with Windows SkyDrive cloud storage for you, where you can rent storage space continuously at a price which may as well be highway robbery. The best part about cloud storage is that there is no guarantee that your data is safe, let alone going to be available. What cloud storage is, and let’s make this clear, is that it is renting space on somebody else’s computer who will gladly “keep it safe” for you for a rental fee that may as well exceed the cost of just buying an external drive altogether. Overall, you may as well be paying a premium to store your own files to the tune of 450x the cost of the hard drive. Of course cloud computing and storage are the big industry when there is a ridiculous amount of money to be made.

 


 

wd-passport-essential-usb-hard-drive

 

Apparently I have $4,500 worth of Cloud Storage in the palm of my hand.

 


 

Then there is Google, which also offers Drive cloud storage services and generously gives 5GB freely. I am aware that there are plenty of cloud computing applications that are a benefit to humanity such as GMail, Google Docs, etc… I’m not disputing that at all. What I’m getting at is that cloud storage as it is currently presented seriously bothers me.

 

My personal thoughts about this are that the security and privacy of your data is about as expectant as you would imagine with say, Facebook. Which is to say, they all talk a big game but likely fall flat on their face in practice. There is nothing to say that the data center doesn’t have a cascade failure, or that the service itself isn’t discontinued after you’ve spent all that time investing in it with your data.

 

If you think that’s not likely, just ask yourself about Apple and their now defunct MobileMe cloud system that so many people jumped onboard. When Apple moved over to iCloud one of the things that wasn’t included in the transition just happened to be the MobileMe iDisk storage service. Essentially, users are prompted to download all of their data locally to avoid losing it.

 

 

What happens to the files on my MobileMe iDisk?

 

You can continue using MobileMe iDisk through June 30th, 2012, even after moving to iCloud. After June 30th, iDisk will no longer be available. You should save copies of all files stored on iDisk before that date. Please read this article for details.

 

 

   

You wouldn’t think this is a big deal but in the future it likely will be more of a problem when things like this happen. The only reason it’s even feasible right now to follow those directions from Apple about downloading all of your files from iDisk to avoid losing your data is because your local hard drive is actually big enough to handle that… The real question that I’m left asking internally is why the hell didn’t Apple simply migrate iDisk data over to iCloud for their users automatically?

 

But with tablets and hybrids, the internal storage is intentionally smaller in order to create a need to use these built-in cloud storage options (like iCloud or SkyDrive) so you actually become wholly dependent on it for your main drive.

 

So let’s fast forward 5 years where your average computer is a tablet hybrid and the internal storage is about 500GB as an SSD. Even under the premise that cloud storage is going to get cheaper, a scenario like the one above where migration or storage failure requires you to back up your stuff locally – you likely aren’t going to have that option since you’ve essentially had no need to have an adequate local storage system and it was so much more compelling and cheaper to buy a tablet with only 128GB internal storage (if you’re lucky).

 


 

Files - SkyDrive_1340200137177

 

April 1997 is when I got my Hotmail account. Now Microsoft just attaches everything to it.

 


 

Of course there is the other caveat for this cloud storage paradigm in that it’s only useful if you have wireless internet access. Otherwise, if you’re in a dead zone or don’t have WiFi where you’re at, you’re pretty much screwed out of most of your data.

 

Cloud storage and applications should be treated as a secondary option, and not your primary option. But unfortunately they are being integrated into the operating systems and devices under the premise of being your primary. That’s what bothers me… well, that and no longer just buying a program but instead indefinitely renting it – which I’ll concede isn’t totally the norm at this point but does seem to be happening with gaming and other media forms (ebooks). You may as well be renting your games indefinitely at this point if you’re paying for a subscription to an online gaming service like Steam, XBox Live, Origin, etc just to be able to play the game you actually bought.

 

Ten years ago you would have been up in arms about this. You just bought a video game at retail price (let’s say $50), you get home and install it. You fire that bad boy up and find out in order to play it you have to have internet access and the game must be able to check into the server periodically (or all the time) for it to work. The moment you no longer have an internet connection, the game stops working. The moment the publisher’s servers stop working, so does your game. The moment they discontinue their authentication server for your game, your game becomes worthless.

 

When Square|Enix did Final Fantasy XI Online I immediately stopped playing Final Fantasy games entirely. I understand the interest with online multiplayer gaming, I really do. I’m an avid user of Second Life and also have a Minecraft account. But the art of single player or multiplayer at home is pretty much a dying breed any more. There’s a reason, I suspect, that flash games online are a big ticket for entertainment. It’s because those games are modeled after the simpler games we used to play years ago where they were more about fun than trying to cram graphics. They have to make up the lack of graphics with actual storyline and gameplay.

 


 

Less is More?

 

The idea about all of this is that the future is not as great as we like to believe. If anything, we’re paying about the same price for considerably less than what we’ve had in the past. I’m not talking about less in a good way, either. Like, smaller components or more efficient circuitry…

 

No, I’m saying less is the new more in the same manner as you’re paying the same amount of money for a thinner tablet that does much less than the laptop you bought a few years ago. Standard on the laptop was a 500GB or 1TB hard drive but on that tablet (even the hybrid) the storage is more likely 32GB, 64GB or for the most expensive model 128GB internal storage for the same price as your laptop a few years ago at 500GB or 1TB internal storage.

 

To make up for giving you less internal storage, these companies found a solution that essentially screws you even harder than you just got screwed by connecting cloud storage to your device and offering to rent you space for a monthly fee that may as well be 450x the cost of the hard drive over the expected lifespan of that hardware.

 

Yes, you read that correctly.

 

If an external 1TB hard drive costs about $100 (which mine did), and the average expected lifespan of that hard drive is about 5 years, then I’ve paid $100 for 1TB of storage that will last 5 years. In comparison, for the equivalent of $75 per month under an average scenario and access to 1TB of cloud storage, I will pay $4,500 over the course of 5 years for the same storage capacity.

 

Take also into account that the operating system (Windows 8 in this example) is less robust than Windows 7 before it. Metro UI is stripped down and very basic in comparison to Windows 7 working environment. No Aero, no real multitasking… everything is pretty much full screen or not at all with Metro. There’s “legacy” support for applications that ran on Windows 7, so windows like you’re kind of used to… but the focus is entirely on Metro for this. Which brings me to another point that the outlet for Metro enabled applications is a choking point app store controlled tightly by Microsoft. I have the same issues with Apple’s App store as well, so don’t think I’m just harping on Microsoft here.

 

Even the bootloader is locked down and so is access to the Win32 API which most applications prior enjoyed access to freely in order to develop for Windows. Now the rules (as if there were rules before this) say that win32 API is off limits as well as a whole slew of other design requirements and guidelines to be accepted into the Metro store.

 

Good Christ… when did this happen?

 

Not specifically, but as a collective of humanity… when did we start really settling for less and paying more for it? When did we start saying it’s ok to have our options taken away from us and strictly controlled? When did we say it was alright to no longer do with the hardware, software and media we legally bought what we want to do with it?

 

When did we stop demanding the freedom to innovate on our own?

 


 

And then I calm down… sort of.

 

I have my gripes about all of this, but my assertion is still sound. I’m not interested in owning a tablet until such time as it becomes a full hybrid that isn’t screwing me over. I love the idea of the screen detaching to become a mobile tablet as my secondary computing paradigm – but not at the expense of my primary computing paradigm in the process.

 

I’m not accepting an either/or scenario.

 

When my tablet/screen is attached to the base, my “real” computer will take over the processing and power. My real computer then, will be my storage where the mobile tablet screen is underwhelming. My real computer, then, will have the desktop paradigm because it makes absolutely no sense to use a tablet interaction paradigm while I’m using a desktop, no more than it makes any sense whatsoever to use a desktop paradigm on a tablet computer.

 

Both will have access to my cloud drive which is a secondary backup but never my primary storage. It’ll be convenient for me because I’ll have access to my files on the go, but I won’t be worried about the service because a majority will be locally stored.

 

Cloud storage to me is a supplementary option that is worth paying for in that context, but never expected to be treated like my primary storage on account of my local system short changing me up front by design.

 

As far as the operating system goes, I like the freedom to run whatever the hell I want on my computer. I like the idea of multitasking, and by god if I want a media player that looks like a Polar Bear on LSD then so be it.

 


 

Bear on LSD

 

Meet Windows Media Player – Aeonix Edition.

 


 

 

I don’t like the idea of having a central application store being my only option under tight constraints to access programs. So this is what I’m expecting shortly after the release of Windows 8 -

 

It’s going to get jail-broken in a hurry. That Start Menu button is going to be there whether Microsoft likes it or not on the Desktop view, and if they fight too hard to force people to use the Metro screen instead, then they’ll just be shooting themselves in the foot. The Bootloader will be unlocked, and ultimately with enough people pissed off about this situation, Windows 8 will work the way that advanced users will demand it to work and not the way Microsoft demands it.

 

Either that or Microsoft is about to lose quite a lot of customers, with or without their new tablet.

 

It doesn’t help the situation when you aren’t willing to build an operating system that a majority of your customers are asking for. Luckily, that’s what Linux is for.

 

As a matter of fact – I might just go back to using Ubuntu Linux thanks to Windows 8.

 


 

gnome-fallback

 

 


 

Unlike Windows 8, I’ll have the option to choose whether or not I want to keep the Unity interface of Ubuntu 12.04 or simply go back to using Gnome (Fallback) like I’m used to. That’s the point that I believe Microsoft is entirely missing here… that people don’t necessarily like or hate Metro, but instead they hate being given no option to choose what they think is best for their own working environment.

 

We’ve had this desktop metaphor since the dawn of the GUI interface in the 1980s. That is a hell of a long time for the computing world to get accustomed to something. Forcing a radical change on people now in 2012 will likely go over about as well as Microsoft BOB or forcing Clippy on people.

 

Generally speaking, the bottom line is this:

 

The idea of a hybrid tablet/laptop is a good idea when put into proper perspective. Right now, however, it’s a veritable clusterfsk of half-baked ideas. Without the ability to choose a desktop paradigm that is familiar when using a keyboard and mouse, the Metro UI being forced on people will invariably be a no-go unless they’re using one of those new tablet hybrids.

 

Essentially it’s an operating system that is trying too hard to please tablet users at the expense of the interaction paradigm over the entire course of personal computing history. While I’m not against change, even if it’s a radical change, I still like the ability to make that choice on my own instead of an all or nothing approach.

 

Given that the only option is Metro in Windows 8 with the desktop paradigm being an afterthought, I will likely end up exercising my right to choose and skip Windows 8 altogether.

 

I don’t really care how amazing they claim the tablet with a keyboard is. It’s a revolution I’ll do without, thank-you.

 

As far as the tablet/hybrid itself:

 

The disturbing trend has been to build half of a computer and sell it to you at full price, while renting you access to the other half indefinitely for 450 times the actual cost. To the business end of things, this seems like a technology wet dream scenario because they’re making money hand over fist off of this. Even more surprising is that society as a whole (that means you) are gladly falling for it.

 

Of course, after seeing the first picture in this post, you probably ignored everything that came afterward.

 


 

 

futurama-shutup-and-take-my-money